Why "users" isn't the right number to size for
Two people on video calls generate more load than twenty people checking email occasionally. Size hardware for concurrent connections and realistic peak usage, not just a headcount.
hAP series: where it still works
MikroTik's hAP series handles smaller offices well and remains capable at the lower end of the 50-user range if usage is light, mostly browsing and email rather than heavy concurrent video or large file transfers.
When you actually need a CCR
Once an office runs consistent heavy concurrent load, video conferencing across many desks, VPN traffic, internal file servers, a CCR-series router's higher processing headroom becomes the safer choice over an hAP pushed past comfortable capacity.
Pairing a router with a PoE switch for growing offices
The router handles routing and firewall duties; a managed PoE switch handles device distribution and can power access points directly. Splitting these roles cleanly scales better than asking one box to do everything.
What Eca Networks sees fail at 50+ users
The most common failure pattern is not router capacity, it is under-specced cabling or a single unmanaged switch trying to serve an entire floor. Router sizing matters, but it is one part of a chain that includes cabling and switching.
Sizing guide by use pattern
| Office profile | Typical fit |
|---|---|
| Light use, under 50 users, mostly browsing/email | hAP series may be sufficient |
| Mixed use, 50+ users, regular video calls | CCR series recommended |
| Heavy use, VPN + internal servers + video | CCR series + managed switching |
Getting current pricing
For current model options sized to your specific office, request a quote.